Blue sky Policy Alert 003
FP7 themes | health | agro | ict | nano | energy | environment | transport | ssh | space | security |
ERA goals | mobility | infrastucture | rtd institutions | knowledge sharing | joint programming | cooperation |
Author(s) | Rafael Popper, Thordis Sveinsdottir, Yanuar Nugroho | |
Contributor(s) | Joe Ravetz, Martin Fatun, Peter Ellwood, Fiona Lickorish, John Reynolds, John Turnpenny | |
Manifestation | Gradual development | Potential impacts in Europe infrastructures ![]() people's lives ![]() legislation & regulation ![]() economy & business ![]() defence & security ![]() government & politics ![]() environment & ecosystems ![]() science & technology ![]() |
Importance for EU | ![]() | |
Strategic attention | by 2030 ![]() ![]() | |
Type of impact | Very negative | |
Inspired by | Brainstorming session and group discussions in the iKNOW Workshop in Manchester (February 2010) | |
Related to | ||
Keywords | standards, communication, networked society, sophisticated society, vulnerability | |
Contemporary society relies on a communication network, which is based on one electronic standard system. Further standardisation such as TCP/IP and 3G which on one hand ease communication processes on the other hand leads to potential security vulnerability. Increasing reliance on computer systems/networks and increase of computer based crime furthermore increases the vulnerability of societal infrastructures, should a natural disaster or acts of terrorism disable communication and energy systems.
Research could focus on examining the nature of societal reliance on standardised systems. Research could focus on developing backup systems that could be used in the event of a current system breakdown. Research could identify areas of vulnerability (e.g. security measures at major power plants, likelihood of terrorist attacks) Research could furthermore use foresight methodologies to examine how society could be prepared for alternative ways of living, should a system breakdown occur.
Research should aim to a) inform the development of an alternative energy and communication system; b) devise strategies for crisis response across Europe; c) inform relevant policy, legislation and regulation across EU; d) inform business enterprise and innovation in this field; e) revise existing policies promoting standardisation; f) explore alternative ways of achieving systems compatibility and interconnectedness.
Threat to energy safety is an important grand challenge for Europe and grand scale disruption to the energy system could have unforeseen consequences for all levels of society. Finding ways of securing energy flow throughout Europe is vital and innovation in this field is important. Joint regulation is also necessary and EU needs to take initiative to formulate a response in the event of threats to food security. EU policy could then provide blueprint for any policy response from the governments of member states.
DIE ZEIT (Germany), Financial Times (Germany), El Heraldo (Colombia), Prospective Foresight Network (France), Nationalencyklopedin (Sweden), EFP - European Foresight Platform (EC), EULAKS - European Union & Latin America Knowledge Society (EC), CfWI - Centre for Workforce Intellience (UK), INFU - Innovation Futures (EC), Towards A Future Internet (EC), dstl - Defence S&T Laboratory (UK), EFSA - European Food Safety Agency (EU), Malaysia Foresight Programme (Malaysia), Bulletins Electroniques more...